The glyph for TCP-01254 is incorrect; it should be ⿽戈一 (just like GCP-00139), not ⿽弋一.
Actually, ⿽弋一 is already the representative glyph for U+2FB98 in the same block...
The glyph for TCP-01248 is incorrect; it should be ⿽弋十 (just like GCP-00146), not ⿽戈十.
Actually, ⿽戈十 is already the representative glyph for U+2298F in the CJKUI Extension B block...
The representative glyphs for U+2FB3A are respectively ⿻冊一 and ⿻册一, which should be all right since they are certainly unifiable.
However, it should be noted that the representative glyph for U+2FB3A(GH) is already U+2054B(TJP), and that the representative glyph for U+2FB3A(T) is already U+2F816(T), so this may create "duplicate" issues...
